<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Cheat sheet for managing files from Ruby	</title>
	<atom:link href="/cheat-sheet-for-managing-files-from-ruby/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>/cheat-sheet-for-managing-files-from-ruby/</link>
	<description>Red Panthers - Experts in Ruby on Rails, System Design and Vue.js</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2017 19:59:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=5.2.7</generator>
			<item>
				<title>
				By: eibhinn				</title>
				<link>/cheat-sheet-for-managing-files-from-ruby/#comment-62</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[eibhinn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2017 19:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://redpanthers.co/?p=1596#comment-62</guid>
					<description><![CDATA[Thanks so much for an awesome post! This is a great tutorial. A quick thought: in my experience `read` is more widely used and is friendlier than `sysread` (no exceptions) -- is there a reason you’re choosing `sysread` for general cases? Would be interested to know. In any case, thanks again for the excellent resource!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks so much for an awesome post! This is a great tutorial. A quick thought: in my experience `read` is more widely used and is friendlier than `sysread` (no exceptions) &#8212; is there a reason you’re choosing `sysread` for general cases? Would be interested to know. In any case, thanks again for the excellent resource!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
						</item>
			</channel>
</rss>
